This blog is three books in the process of being written, in the form of initial drafts of the sections, posted in the intended order, a project for which the overall name is Explorations. The three books are a continuation from Hidden Valleys: Haunted by the Future (Zero Books - 2015), and also from On Vanishing Land, an audio-essay made by myself and Mark Fisher (released by Hyperdub/Flatlines on 26th July, 2019 - https://hyperdub.net).
Explorations: Zone Horizon (1 - 18)
Explorations: The Second Sphere of Action (19 - 30)
Explorations: Through the Forest, the River (31 - 50)
2.
heat-vision
We are both looking toward the headlong calm of the river, and the tangled, overgrown garden. "When I came here to do the conservation research," says Gabriela, "a space opened up in my life. I had my work, but I was cut off from everyone. They were all two thousand miles away. And something emerged into the space - I willed a new side of myself into existence, I dreamed it up, and I made it real. I embodied it. It all seemed like a deprivation at the beginning, and then I realised it was an opportunity, and because I persevered with what I had dreamed up, eventually something came into existence within the gap."
"The nomadic and tribal societies all find themselves surrounded by a state society which is fundamentally dominant, and which destroys their dream of existence and their way of life. But conversely, for each one of us, whether indigenous in origin or not, if we dream and then actualise an effective, inspired form of existence, and a pragmatics of intensification, by drawing, in part, on what is valuable and lucid from across all of the nomadic and tribal worlds, then we find that it is we who are intrinsically at a supervenient level - in relation to the dominatory and destructive forces of the state societies." Gabriela Rodriguez
*
I am turning onto a mostly grassed-over dirt track that goes down a slope toward a semi-wilderness area around a river, and toward a single large house. The glacier-mantled peak of El Tronador is ten miles to the west, on my left, and the tiny clouds in the sky seem somehow to be attuned to the glitter of dust on the track. My long brownish-fair hair is being ruffled by a breeze, it is midday, and hot. The house will be empty. I have never been there before, and astonishingly it belongs to me. But what will I find there? And more importantly, where will this house take me?
- I get up, the green, gently turbulent loop of the river coming into view. Going down the ladder again I am confronted with the idea that the belvedere is a kind of doorway, or that it is a key to a doorway in the form of another hyperperceptual dimension of the house.But the clarity of these thougts fades with the memory of the experience that led to them, and i am left wondering if most of what is happening is fanciful, jealousy-inspired nonsense, and distorted wish-fulfillment.I walk down toward the river, feeling the need to steady myself.. The wild roses and blackberries must be introduced species, I think,unlike the dwarf pampas grass with its blonde, flag-like flowers. And beyond these flowers the glassy, opaque green-ness of the river, amongst its slews and abutments of rounded rocks and pebbles. The unmistakable green of the meltwaters of glaciers.
[section unfinished]
I stretch out my sleeping bag on the pullout bed. I have turned on a lamp in a corner of the room. And now I go to turn out the main light. As I do this I focus on a set of five copies of Le Petit Prince on a shelf, all in different languages. One of them is in Swedish, Lille Prinsen. I switch off the light, and get into the sleeping bag. For a moment I am hearing the title of Exupery's book pronounced in the distinctive, emphasised intonation of Svenska, a language with which I have some familiarity because of several holidays in Sweden. I adjust the pillow thinking that to outsiders the language can seem to have an almost eldritch quality. And then my mind inevitably wanders to the phrase 'the essential is invisible to the eyes,' and, listening to the silence around me, this phrase in turn suggests itself as a way of thinking about the house. My thoughts go straight to my Oxford encountress and chosen house-guardian. Aware that in fact she will have no connection - other than through me - to the 'essence' of the house, I nonetheless decide to think about what happened on the day when I gave the talk in Oxford, and when I had been hoping that Seb and I might embark on a relationship. Jealous annoyance will be a good antidote to fear of intruders and of the paranormal, and re-living the experience will no doubt help me get to sleep.
She had said something earlier in relation to astrology that had started to make me feel extremely frustrated with her. And then she began to talk about human beings as, in essence, energy and perception, and I argued with her about it, and as the argument went on I began to have an alarm bell ringing at the back of my mind, telling me that under other circumstances I would have agreed with some of the things she was saying. But the damage was done - even though I backed down from my disagreement. I felt annoyed with Seb, and later, when we were on our own in the Lebanese restaurant, our rapport did not quite return to how it had been. I had the impression (which later I did not trust) that I could see through him to something superficial and concupiscent, so when he made a pass at me I rejected him. Afterwards I knew for certain that if my mood had not been altered the evening would not have ended in this way. And that was it, Mystic Megan had leaned into our lives, and prevented our relationship.
But now my animosity fades, as if I have burnt off a last residue of distress in a flare of re-living the event. I feel comfortable, and distant from what happened, a feeling both that the relationship with Seb was a bad idea, and somehow that it had all happened to someone else. I turn onto my side, from lying on my back. I think about the verandah - and then the belvedere, and about sitting there facing the sound of the river, and the faintly seen expanses of the night mountain, lit by starlight. I feel how amazing it is that there are pumas in these mountains. For a moment I have the sensation, for the first time in many years, that the bed is spiralling upward. And I feel that the house is a large, beautiful cave that I have found, and that I am warm and safe, and can slip away into the beckoning other-world of sleep.
*
Initially I remember only the final part of the dream. I lie on my back, suffused with the feelings of the woman in the dream, and there is the name... Kalthos. When I sit up I stare toward the sunlight, bemused - and then the whole dream comes back.
I am shocked by it - it is as if a tremor has gone through me. It is one of the most extraordinary dreams I have had. I sort out a very basic breakfast, with food from my pack, and I make coffee; and all the time I am re-living the dream. I feel it has validity in some way, but I don't give any creedence to any of its specifics. And sitting on the verandah, in dappled sunshine, the impression of the dream being a glimpse of a current in the human world stays with me. I am struck by Cargill being the main figure, and feel glad that the disturbing aspect of the dream is so impersonal - given I am living in Cargill's house. I decide the dream is maybe a view of something real at a depth-level of human history, but that it has taken the form of an ultracharged, dramatic expression. I shake my head, astonished. I decide to leave it to one side, and to do something very active, to focus myself. I am here to be in Patagonia, not to be lost in reveries about dreams. I will walk up onto the mountain, and then will descend from the summit in the direction of Pampa Linda.
The Other Vantage
A summit of the Sayan mountains. To the south, Tuva, Mongolia and China; to the northeast, eastern Siberia; to the east and southeast, North America and South America.
There is a profound need for an alternative
abstract vantage on a planetary level, and one which has a historical depth
which stretches across millenia. And most specifically what is needed is a
transcendental-empirical vantage of this kind, where it is maximally effective
in terms of displacing the biases and assumptions of the dominant abstract
vantages which are currently in effect.
The two dominant regions can respectively be
abbreviated to the USA, Europe and the Middle East/ North Africa on the one hand, and, on the
other, China and India.
A main point of origin of the 'western' region's
dominant vantage is the Nile delta (to quite a large extent this domain of the human world is
living in post-Egyptian times). This vantage has Judaic, Christian and Islamic
versions. However, there is another line of historical depth involved, which
consists of the other main point of origin for this region, and the one which, of these two, perhaps has
most reason to call itself the 'omphalos'. This other historical line can
either be a supplementary line to one of the other variations (where the emphasis
will be on figures such as Plato and Aristotle), or it can be a primary line -
amongst many others lines - of a transcendental-empirical vantage, where the
main figures of ancient Greece are Sophocles, Homer, Heraclitus, and
the Stoics.
The other region is bisected by the Himalayas, and is double: it does not have a zone of depth-lines that goes down to a single, small area that would be equivalent to the coasts of the far east of the Mediterranean. (Everything is multiplicitous here, but it would be correct to say that this region has two dominant vantages: one that includes and is largely centred upon the Hindi socio-cultural worlds of India, and one that includes China).
A key point about these two regions (the Nile region and the Himalayas region) is that there
is a differential that runs between them which consists of a greater emphasis
on disciplines of the body (including dance disciplines, but with key examples
in the form of tai chi, martial arts and yoga) on the one hand, and, on the
other hand, future-projection gravity modalities where the projected future
consists of the destruction of the planet - together with the rest of the
cosmos - and of a world-concluding event in the form of transcendent judgement.
The alternative abstract vantage has two primary zones. The first of these zones consists of India, central and eastern Siberia, Mongolia and China. The second consists of an area that extends from Amazonia and Peru to Mexico and to the USA - an area that can be called Central America. But taken as a whole the vantage is the entirety of the terrains consisting of India, the southeast of mainland Asia, Japan, Eastern Siberia, North America and South America (topographically, one of its features is that is contains the highest mountains in the southern and northern hemispheres, and in terms of names which disable the optic of the nation state, after the Sayan Mountains at the the time of writing two of its best names are Tuva and Patagonia).
The first primary zone is the area pertaining to a nexus of elements:
The physical disciplines of India and China, such as Chi Gung, Yoga, Tai Chi and the Chinese martial arts.
The book Tao Te Ching
The story of Lao Tsu writing Tao Te Ching at a customs post, before leaving China.
The nomadism of Mongolia, Tuva and Siberia.
The shamanism of eastern Siberia.
The second primary zone is the area pertaining to a nexus consisting of two main elements:
The shamanism and nomadism of the (approximately) twenty thousand years since humans arrived in this region, together with the shamanism and transhumance / semi-nomadism of the current time.
A small number of recently-written books consisting of sustained transcendental-empiricism which draws upon the area's shamanic systems of thought.
If the lenses of these two zones are laid over each other, what becomes visible in relation to the simultaneous functioning of the two lenses?
1. The escape-route; the way; the path leading toward wider realities. (and in a way where it is clear that this can always simultaneously be described as a force - the Other Force; Love-and-Freedom).
2. The crucial importance of becoming-woman - for both men and women, a trans-faculty process of being 'in becoming' with women.
3. A mind that is radically different from the mind of ordinary-reality, and which is an escape from what can be called the 'ego' or the 'self'. (the mind of ordinary-reality is here recognised as a world of indulgence, as well as a world of controlling and control-obsessed behaviour, and the worlds of customary 'learning,' taken as a whole, are perceived as having profoundly problematic aspects).
4. The planet as fundamentally important, and as having, in some sense, a female aspect (in both domains of writing this female aspect is referenced in a definitively minimal way, as evidently a part of the horizon of the knowable, at this stage of knowledge).
5. The body as fundamentally important.
6. The existence of an energetic but non-extensive aspect within the world (with an unknown extent) consisting of what can be termed either the body-without-organs / bodies-without-organs, or the domain of intent, dreams, feeling, and thought.
7. The embodied affirmation of forms of conciseness that consist of abstraction and of oneiric/figurative modalities.
8. The recurrent fundamental importance of 'leaving' - of moving on; of not staying to garner kudos; of not staying to insist/impose in relation to a viewpoint; of moving away and disappearing from sight.
(There are two primary aspects of of the additional expanses that can be seen from the second zone:
The second sphere of action
The semi-group - the nexus of individuals who are travelling into the unknown in the direction of Love-and-Freedom. )
There is a crucial difference between the depth-line of the vantage, and the view seen from the vantage. Ultimately what is fundamental is the view from the vantage: however the depth-line also has a high level of importance.
The elements of the depth-line are the following:
1. The journey into the Americas - and settlement of the Americas - that took place around 20,000 to 30,000 years ago. Here it is important that there are no technological features of Siberian shamanism that prevent its back-permeation to 30,000 years ago (the oldest musical instruments which have been found are from 40,000 years in the past), so that the tendency is for the image of the 'caveman' to be entirely undermined in connection with this spectacular adventure of exploration and migration. This does not mean that any assumption can be made about the peoples who undertook it, but it does mean that another 'spiritual and cultural modality' insists, as opposed to that of the club-wielding dweller-in-caves.
2. The civilisations from 5000 years ago such as Norte Chico in what is now Peru and the Harrapa in what is now now Pakistan and northwest India: not because these involve cities, but because there are indications that these cultures were less based on war, and imposition of control by destruction, than the urban social formations which followed.
3. The steppe/Siberian/Mongolian nomad (and transhumant) cultures of the last two and a half thousand years.
4. Tao Te Ching, with its reference to a past tradition, which it refers to as 'ancient masters of way' (it is helpful to re-perceive this by replacing 'masters of way' with 'practitioners of metamorphics').
5. The history of recurrent collapses of tyrannical mega-states in Central America. This suggests the functioning of a knowledge of what is wrong with state societies. This is a suggestion of an escape-route which was substantially in effect, but it does not at all entail that those on the path of departure were those who defeated the empires. It seems more likely that those on this escape-path lived a precarious existence, subject to recurrent destruction - but that their presence within the social fabric sowed seeds which were the undoing of the tyrannies.
6. The works of Donner, Castaneda and Abelar. These must be seen as either direct expressions of an extant lineage of metamorphics, tracing its roots to the pre-Colombian era, or as an engagement with the anthropological worlds of the region expressing itself as a new modality of metamorphics. Because of the lucidity and validity of the works the suggestion here, in this second case, would very much be that a planetary unconscious has gone into effect producing visionary works of metaphysics and pragmatics. This leaves the idea that the works are more interesting if the second case applies, than they would be if they were the product of a pre-Colombian lineage.
Characterised across all of its aspects this is the vantage of nomadism. It is the vantage of existence on the definitive terrain, which consists of the planet, and of individuals who are waking their faculties.
The fact that the Sayan mountains are associated with nomadism in the customary sense is the beginnings of an explanation of why this terrain has been chosen as a focal point. The crucial point here is that nomadism in the conventional sense shares the aspect of deterritorialisation, in that the modality of the terrain-nomad involves existence on - and movement across - a terrain, as opposed to existence within a state territory. (This 'non-territorial' attribute is fundamental, but ultimately what is in question is always nomadism in intensity, as opposed to extensive nomadism).
The first point about the Sayan mountains is that they are in the region which provides the most effective view on a primary aspect of the depth-line of the vantage. They are within - or at least alongside - the area from which humans set out, nomadically, on what is probably the most spectacular exploration into a new terrain that they have ever undertaken. And it is valuable to see this not only from the point of view of the start of the journey into the unknown, but also from a viewpoint which displaces the 'new world' not just into the terrain peopled by the nomads, but into the 'east' - a minor displacement in some ways, but one that is helpful in terms of seeing with fresh eyes.
The reasons for the Sayan mountains in particular are these.
Firstly they are trans-territorial, in that they are both in Russia and in Asia, and, not only that, Tuva is both part of Russia, and characterises itself as the centre of Asia.
Secondly, they are primarily a non-human domain, so that they maximally connect with the idea of terrain, as opposed to territory.
Thirdly, the Sayan mountains are part of the Eastern Siberian region which is most closely associated with shamanism - the modality of knowledge that in its most developed form consists of metamorphics.
Fourthly, they are exterior to the central regions of the two dominant vantages, standing outside of the main zones of reactive dreaming which correspond to the vantages. This is not because, in relation to one of these, they are a long way from the Nile Delta (the USA is a long way from the Nile Delta, but it is currently one of the two most powerful centres of the 'western' dominant vantage), and nor is it because (in relation to the part of the Sayan north of the Mongolian border) the dreamings of Russia/Russian orthodox religion do not currently have a very wide impact. It is because, situated alongside Mongolia, and confronting Russian authoritarianism, ethnic Tuvans have a relatively high degree of resistance to the reactive dream-systems of the colonists, and because the Mongolian Sayan are beyond this region of influence. Secondly, it is because the Sayan Mountains are a long way from the terrains which are standardly part of the dream-spaces of indigenous Chinese religion, and of Hinduism, and are on the far periphery of Buddhism. And here being peripheral does not indicate a higher level of intensity, but instead indicates a split between Buddhism and an outside of Buddhism in the form, to a large extent, of the vestiges of shamanic adherences and identification. These are relatively widespread in the Mongolian Sayan as well as being a main tradition in Tuva. And in the Krasnoyarsk Sayan region, north of the border with Tuva, there is almost no Buddhism.
This vantage gives a different history - a history from the viewpoint of nomadism in the full sense. And as such it produces a genealogical critique of the world of the civitas - the worlds of the cities. (However, what is most important is the ahistorical view: the view that is the same whether the book functioning as a lens was written in the last few decades or two and a half thousand years ago).
The history is located on terrain, not on territory or 'countries'. It is centred on a specific, small-scale terrain, and its - temporally indeterminate - starting-point is the time just before human beings started to arrive in the Americas, so that the viewpoint relates to the planet as much as it relates to the human world (it therefore reminds of the need to suspend the dogmatic image of the world in relation to the planet). It is also centred on nomadism and on shamanism, with shamanism understood as consisting, in its developed form, of metamorphics.
What can be straightforwardly seen is that there was the movement into the Americas. What can also be seen is the view from the texts - from around 2400 years ago, and from the second half of the 20th century.
And then there is an impersonal silence in which civilisations and cities appear and then disappear; in which states become mounds covered with jungle, and in which writing is not taken up as a sacralised, records-of-the-centuries shiboleth. The Aztec state machine had only been in existence for two centuries, and saw itself as an inheritor to the Toltecs, who did not use writing. And the Incas were a new (and very recent) societal mega-formation, and, again, did not employ writing. It is as if the horror is being fended off on two levels that are not directly correlated: firstly at the level of dominatory social formations like the Maya (and the Aztecs and the Incas), and secondly at the level of writing, as a function which is deeply embroiled in the suppression-metaphysics of state societies.
Cahokia, on the banks of the Mississipi, was the size of London in the 13th century, and only a few years later was just mounds in the grass (this was a hundred years before the arrival of the first Europeans). Its people had departed from it, it had been grassed over, and no tales of it are told - it was it seems the unspeakable.
The possibility here is that those who overcame such cities had been assisted in some way by people who were on the escape-path of metamorphics, people who had transmitted an awareness that in a fundamental and disturbing sense these cities were not movements toward Love-and-Freedom. That they were movements in the direction of coercion, destruction and suppression - like capitalism.
*
It is important to see the way in which this vantage opens up a distance from main aspects of customary forms of learning. Tao Te Ching is explicit on this subject, and a crucial aspect of the Castaneda/Donner/Abelar texts is that they do not reference philosophical works: instead the references are quotations from poems. The references within Castaneda's books to poems from around the world are what appear in the place of quotations from philosophical or anthropological works.
It is to be remembered that the form of Tao Te Ching on one level can called 'poetry.' But the crucial idea here is not that of poetry but is that when what is finding expression is a combined functioning of lucidity and reason the result is that the writing is always a form of outlandish - the new-every-time language of nomadism.
The books from the central area of the Americas also display a modality of lucid conciseness in relation to their philosophical formulas, but they do this in the context of the advantage of also being narrative accounts. Outlandish is new every time, but this is a fundamental expansion which allows lucidity and reason to work at a much higher level of effectiveness. And under these circumstances everything that is included is important.
There are no references to Chinese texts, but there is a very small number of references to Chinese traditions of waking the body, and to Chinese ideas, and a brief account of how, several generations in the past, an emigree from China became a member of the lineage that is described in the books, and how this figure had a vital impact upon it. There is also a positive reference at one point to India.
The inclusions and omissions are subtle but extremely emphatic. At the level of philosophy the western traditions are not included, with the exception of an extremely oblique, ultra-minimal reference to Marcus Aurelius, where the reference does not connect to any quotation. Everything is referenced to the central area of the Americas, from Mexico to the jungle terrains of southern Venezuela, along with a subtle link that goes to China and India, but which references no text. Beyond this what is referenced - and quoted - is poetry: a poem by Jimenez from Spain, a poem by Dylan Thomas, a poem by Vallejo from Peru, a poem by Octavio Paz and Mexico. In relation to philosophy everything is kept within a zone that extends only as far as Asia. And beyond this there is poetry, alongside the achievements of the overall human world at the level of engineering (there is a reference to the immense achievements of humans as engineers, existing alongside the atrophy or collapse of their 'other side'; and separately there is a reference to the scientist/inventor/architect Buckminster Fuller).
To give any sort of positive reference is to recommend, and there is no doubt at all about what is being said here. The vantage is exceptionally consistent in terms of its openness: it is open to the planet and its exteriority (the sun and the stars), but it is not open to what is deeply inflected by the suppression-systems of the ongoing human disaster.
There is a depth-level consistent aspect to this refining to an effective zone of elements. Humans have fetishised language, and they have made a special place in this fetishisation for writing. Inseparably, they have fetished mathematics, with the recent change of polarity of the system of reason-and-revelation bringing mathematics to the forefront. A fetishation of this kind blocks any awareness of relative importance, and blocks the development of the other faculties (it also functions as a machine for producing a feeling of superiority in relation to the beings we call 'animals').
Most crucially, the vantage in question involves a radical distancing and de-fetishising in relation to writing.
It is necessary to refine to a set of effective maps - a set of works consisting of outsights, and guidelines for travelling into wider realities. And more importantly, as the fundamental part of the process involved, it is necessary to effectuate the other faculties.
In particular, it is necessary to start from the faculties of perception and dreaming.
This is an effective way of moving forward. It is possible to work with the texts of this vantage, and leave to one side any process of close engagement with the texts of western philosophy. And, even if this specific strategy is not adopted, it is valuable to see the world from this viewpoint - a viewpoint which has discarded the valorisation of this sub-domain within writing.
But the texts of this vantage do not self-valorise as bodies of writing - it is more that they radically do the opposite of this. The spokesperson figures within the recent books - Don Juan, and the female figures such as Esperanza and Nelida in Being-in-Dreaming - are not advocates of writing as a crucial part of the way forward. The statement made about poetry - by the persona Don Juan - is that recurrently phrases or sections within poems get very close to saying what needs to be said, in that they embody a powerful, haunting awareness of something that is transcendental. But this statement does not come from a figure who is a writer, or who advocates writing, and Don Juan gives no affirmative statement about Castaneda's books (it is also the case that Castaneda does not refer back to his books, other than at the very end, in that he compiles, in the form of the book The Wheel of Time, a set of quotations from Don Juan - the non-writer - taken from all of the books, where this book includes statements made by Florinda Grau, another spokesperson figure who makes no mention of writing). It is stated that universities can function to prepare the mind in relation to concepts and theoretical systems, but what is here alongside - and at a higher level than - poetry is not writing but is the world of the acts and statements of those whose existence is about escaping to wider realities.
The crux of the thought is not that there is something especially pernicious about writing, but is that in setting out to escape from ordinary reality it is exceptionally problematic - and generally damaging - to give any emphasis to writing, because writing is more language, and the primary aim is reaching the point where you can stop internal verbalising - the internal dialogue - and reach inner silence, a state from which woken faculties can at last begin to go into sustained effect. The books do not spare themselves the force of this thought, in that even when books consist of outsights and effective diagrams, human indulgence - in terms of reading and not acting - can still entail that they can be elements of a trap.
*
The two dominant vantages are two different modalities of existence within - and of maintaining - ordinary, collapsed reality. They are two, state-established expressions of the system of reason-and-revelation. The southeast Mediterranean vantage has more reactive/dogmatic delirium on the side of revelation, and the trans-Himalayan vantage has less reactive/dogmatic delirium, and has a stripped down Chinese form which has reduced the delirium to the Hegelianism of the idea of the global Destiny of China (the two modalities exist, in different forms, everywhere, but these are specific state-instititionalised forms). The Sayan vantage is something of an entirely different nature - it consists of departure from ordinary reality.
Ultimately what is being delineated here is the Sayan modalilty of thought and existence - the Sayan modality. And as long as the pragmatics of travelling across upward thresholds (an ongoing development of an embodied pragmatics) is understood in reference to thought, then this can also be described as the Sayan modality of thought.
The Sayan modality expresses itself as a dreaming in the form of an account of the world, where this dreaming consists of outsights, as a dreaming in the form of narrative as an overall aspect or of proto-narrative elements, as a liberatory pragmatics - and, lastly, accounts-and-systems-of-guidelines that are emergent from the Sayan modality also intrinsically have the aspect that they are expressions of the planetary sublime (they hold open, in including profoundly anomalous, enigmatic elements, a view of the planet-in-its-exteriority as fundamentally heartening and inspiring, while simultaneously being the transcendentally unknown).
The Arkadian modality is in a chronically collapsed state, which is to say that it is divided in a sense which is similar to that of 'lobotomised'. Sophocles and Socrates, Shakespeare and Spinoza, Shakespeare and Newton (on the opposite side from the 'art' side of the modality there is a further split between philosophy and science). All of this does relate to partial deterritorialisations - partial escapes - but the key point is that there is no expression of the Arkadian modality overall. If there was a pervasive escape from this direction then while it would carry traces of where it came from it would be an expression of the Sayan modality.
And the concluding point is that the Arkadian modality is in effect in China and India - to take two examples - in the same way as in Europe etc., and ultimately is not in any way an import from the West. The overall space of the vantages in India and China, and the different manifestations of the system of reason-and-revelation, entail that the expressions of the Arkadian modality from the east of Eurasia have traces of different kinds, and although this modality has a very pronounced, starkly visible 'western' development along the historical axis, it is a modality that at depth is emergent through ordinary reality's constricted and control-inflected formation of the faculties. It is not one of the systems of this formation, but the definitively dysfunctional split between the two sides is an effect of it.
*
In relation to philosophical texts the approach taken by Explorations has not been substantially different from the one which has just been outlined. The very small number of philosophical texts referenced - the main text amongst these has evidently been A Thousand Plateaus - are all books where there is a very strong current leading further out into the transcendental-empirical; books which are written in outlandish.
The primary difference has been of a different kind, concerning the fact that a main focus of Explorations has been narrative, and, in general, has been the issue of 'dreamings'. In connection with the space of what is customarily called art, the affirmation of poetry has had a further affirmation placed alongside it - the affirmation of works which most centrally are narratives, such as The Waves, Hamlet, and "The Erl-King".
The question of dreamings/narratives has been central on several levels. The Sayan vantage concerns a new account of the development of the human world over the last twenty thousand years (and it will be noticed that all available resources have been used for breaking open this view, including concepts from A Thousand Plateaus, so that this section points toward a view that has no explicit connection to western philosophy, but in fact makes the view visible to a large extent with work from this other tradition).
It needs to be said, of course, that this vantage could be given other names generated by other parts of the terrain. To call it the Patagonian vantage would name it according to the furthest extent of the journey that started with the crossing from Siberia to Alaska (and would connect it to a place which is trans-territorial).
And the Sayan Vantage is a placeholder for a planetary view. An account that goes wider and deeper, and which ultimately, as with all these accounts, leads to what is fundamental - the view of the escape-route that leads further out into the World.
We come from Africa. We should forget about the enclampment of the ancient Egyptian empire in the southwestern Mediterranean, and think about the arrival of humans at the Nile delta 100,000 years ago.
Many of us upheld an impressive extensive-nomadism tradition in Australia for around sixty thousand years (nomadism in this form is not the escape-route, but it is a zone of the place from which the escape-route departs).
Over the last five thousand years, in the north and east of Eurasia, and across North and South America the collapse into the state-domination form of the sedentary was to a very great extent avoided, with the same avoidance being achieved across large areas of Africa. The worlds of sedentary-tribal, transhumant and extensive-nomadic societies have their own grim aspects, but it is in the state societies where the ongoing disaster reaches its most horrific form (when we stopped travelling with the herds rulers started to treat people like sheep, a process which has not come to an end, but has only become more disguised as the control-modality within the human world has acquired more powerful methods).
This section does not aim to set up any detailed account of the other transcendental-empirical vantage - the one with the historical depth-line which goes to the northern coastlands of the eastern Mediterranean (to Sophocles, Homer, Heraclitus...), and which has a ploblematic split into 'art' and 'philosophy.' It is true that Shakespeare's work is a key element in this vantage, but you would be better to keep the focal point of this vantage as the terrains to the north and east of the eastern Mediterranean. And more importantly, although the main elements of this vantage are now distributed across the terrains of the planet, this is not the reason for not working on it in detail. In terms of philosophy the path leads onward into the philosophy of the Sayan vantage, and in terms of literature the work is better taken up in a wider context.
The question therefore is - what do you see if you overlay the viewpoints of both specific vantages?
It is necessary, for a moment to describe the aspects of the lens system which are in the foreground as a result of what has been added:
1.
accounts of constitutively different modalities of attention and action.
stories of decisive breaks or 'ruptures' in the course of a life, involving an upward threshold crossing.
stories of disappearances-across-a-threshold
stories of departures to a fundamentally different milieu.
stories of other worlds, immanently alongside this one.
2.
Stories of desert terrains, mountain terrains, forest terrains, scurfland terrains, sky terrains.
From one point of view it can be said that what is being seen is metamorphosis in its planetary context. But it is more correct to say that what is being seen is the second sphere of action, and is the threshold crossing to a transformed and heightened modality of attention and action that is the one which pertains to the second sphere of action; to existence on the definitive terrain.
As well as consisting on one level of jolts and ruptures, the metamorphosis in the form of the threshold crossing to the initial (how the second sphere of action appears as it comes into focus) has two correlates:
sky spaces, wilderness spaces, hinterland spaces, scurfland spaces
the semi-group; the transformative lines of alliances
(with both of these it is possible for them to be substantially at the level of the virtual-real)
A further point is that although the sea is a wilderness space it is de-emphasised here. It seems that recurrently the sea, in comparison with the sky and with hinterland terrains, is in some way less effective as a smooth space.
Although this writing - Explorations - is not attempting to give an account of the other transcendental-empirical vantage it seems that it must be seen as an expression of it, and as an attempt to bring its two sides together. However, most fundamentally the attempt is to make a kind of bridge - a new junction-point in the form of becomings - that goes from the Arkardian vantage to the Sayan vantage.
A door is banging in the wind. There is a distant view of a tree-covered ridge through the window of the house. It is hot, and there is a scent of the jasmine that is blossoming around the window. Motes of dust are swirling in the sunlight.
The people who own the house have gone off to another country, and they will not be back for months. The small bird on the window-sill looks at you with a glittering eye, hops forward along the ledge, and then flies off.
When you look toward these spaces, the faculty of feeling will tell you what you need to know.
*
She was walking north along the gravel road, stands of pine-trees on either side, and mountains visible in the distance. Occasionally a car would go by, raising a cloud of dust. She kept expecting she would see someone she recognised in one of the cars, but she had travelled north by coach for thirty miles before starting out, so it was unlikely.
After the meeting - and her revelation about Leandro's company - something in Ayelen's look had made her aware that she had gone too far. She had been right to intervene on behalf of the forests, but the timing and the circumstances had created antagonism. Leandro was just too popular, as well as being a major local employer. It was fortunate the arson attack had not killed anyone, and even though Leandro was probably not behind this, she felt sure that it was support for him which had been involved.
Ayelen and Danilo would move the process forward: it had only been a fortuitous event which had given her the opportunity to intervene in the way she had. She was a designer and craftswoman who had become involved as an activist, but she needed to think about the details of the stance she would take in trying to protect the forests.
She felt a kind of greyness behind her: the greyness of a set of difficult circumstances; of a place which had given her work, but which had not been where she wanted to live; a greyness that had consisted to a great extent of her frustration and anger.
She had been planning this walk for the last two years. She would walk to Lago Alumine, going west to Pampa Linda at Lago Mascardi, and then going up along the border with Chile, before taking slightly easier routes for the last sixty kilometres of the journey. After this she might return to Buenos Aires, to earn some money. But thinking about the friends she had made the previous summer, who lived near Lago Alumine, she wondered if this area might really be her long-term destination as well.
There were early lupins flowering, multi-coloured, on the grass verges, bright, but a little dusty.
She could feel it ahead of her - it was there in the midday sunlight, and the light-suffused sky above the mountains on the horizon; it was there in the lupins and the pine-trees, and in the breeze gently swirling the dust on the road. A path leading outward, away from everything within herself that she needed to leave behind.
Note 1.
Even near the top of
Mickle Fell a dragonfly
Skims the grass. The forest, suffused with
zenith light,
Spreads to the horizon, the woman’s path
high
Above the drome’s grey mist. She has the
future sight
Is the uplands of the spirit, the nomad
Travelling in existence to the next
sun-green
Threshold: she is the dreams you always
had,
The nomad-traveller-woman who is seen
And then forgotten, and often travels most
When she stays in one place. Embodying the
bond
Of comradeship, the love of wild roses, of
the desert’s forest ghost
She is delight’s bright courage, the love
of way beyond.
This flows from sky and earth, and
re-living’s hidden streams
We must forget our memories and wake our
dreams.
When it is understood in terms of intensive nomadism, what are the aspects of the semi-group?
projects / project-alliances
exploration
waking the faculties / becoming active
applying the principle of Exteriority
In relation to the sublime in human lives it is necessary to stop defining individuals in ways that are centred on who it is they sleep with, and, in general, on the primary, or interactively physical functioning of the reproductive organs, whether at the level of reproduction or the level of sexual acts (sexual acts here encompasses same-sex and heterosexual encounters). At the deepest level - the level which is fundamental - humans are explorers into wider realities. Couple relationships can find a place as units-of-escape within semi-groups primarily consisting of movements toward the Future. It is a major achievement to raise a family in an inspired way, and it is also a major achievement to be part of the creation of an inspired couple relationship, but what is fundamental in relation to the sublime is the movement into wider realities: without this movement individuals condemn themselves either to serial burning-down of relationships, or to a dampened, saddened continuity (for an individual there is no sovereign need for there to be a couple relationship in a process of escape, but if there is one it should be a filament that is bright with its own intensity and, most of all, with the intensity of the journey toward transcendental south). Everything here consists of becomings, not of subjectified stasis, and the two crucial becomings are becoming-planet, and becoming-woman. Becoming-woman is fundamental - if for no other reason - because the constitutive fabric of ordinary reality is profoundly biased toward knowledge and attitudes that are drawn from male experiences (which is to say that there is a set of biases pertaining to ordinary reality where the maleness involved goes far beyond sexual acts, going into the domain of attitudes, forms of knowledge, suppressive systems of the faculties, and processes of presenting female modalities in a negative light). And here it must be seen that - to arrive at the initial point, but in a specific way - becoming-woman must not be centred on sexuality, but must be focused on the entirety of female experience (for instance, this is one reason why it it is vital to read writers such as Virginia Woolf, Barbara O'Brien, Doris Lessing, Angela Carter, Taisha Abelar, Margaret Atwood ...).
The domain of what has been called 'art' consists on the one hand of joys, deterritorialisations and processes of waking the faculties; and on the other hand it consists of outsights about the nature of the world, and the pragmatics of escape (because it consists on one level of transcendental-empirical perceptions it is inseparable from philosophy, and the term philosophy is transmutated in the same change into the term metamorphics, in that metaphysics is here inseparable from pragmatics). And the intensification involved in this change is shown by the way in which everything shifts from the centrality of passivity to the centrality of activity, to the point where art becomes much more than it was before, and in certain respects becomes barely recognisable: to go to another country and adopt a different persona is the height of drama, and a maximal deterritorialisation toward a fluency of the body is the height of dance, but neither of these involves an audience which is appreciating an 'artistic performance'. And the zone of production of sound that is called music not only now exists within a wider sphere of deterritorialisation of sound, but there is a further change where music comes into focus as grimly threaded with modalities that have been set up to be suffused with indulgent and subjectified affects: in particular, all of the damaging gravity of indulgent melancholy, pious anthemic grandeur, etc.
We need to inhabit the tractable, valid problem (and dreaming) of the planet, our explorer-traveller friends, and of ourselves. There is the sphere of the planet, the 'sphere' or milieu of our allies in the process of escape (no matter how minimally interconnected this milieu might be), and, for each of us, the immediate sphere of what is, first and foremost, a zone of perception. We have to become perception; we have to wake our faculties and our alliances, and we have to focus pre-eminently on the terrain - and specific terrains - of the planet, as opposed to focusing on the territories of nation states or on overall systems of human organisation. The sublime of the shamanic/nomadic adventure now goes back tens of thousands of years, but far more fundamental is the spheroambient planet of which this past is an element. There is the immensity of the sky-terrains and surface-terrains of the planet, and then there is the strangeness of the ongoing disaster of the human world as an included domain of filaments - capitalism, and a small number of tribal worlds, but with the interestablishment everywhere. And then, running through the human world, and in different ways in effect within all the zones of this world, there is the current of Exteriority, of Love-and-Freedom.
*
Rise up a little
above the surface of the planet. Below you there are slopes covered in pine-trees,
and valleys threaded with small streams; maybe there are blackberries, wild
roses, lupins, fuschias; on the horizon in the direction of the equator there
are hills and mountains. Rise up a little further and experience the planet
through feeling; a bright sphere of the unknown and yet intensely known – the atmosphere,
and the more solid sphere within the atmosphere, and the surface of the more solid
sphere, with the networks of its different plant and animals domains, many of
which extend expansively into the atmosphere,
through spores and through different forms of flight.
Rise up still further into the rarified upper zones of the
atmosphere, so that the expanses of cirrostratus clouds and the tops of the
highest thunderstorms are far below you. And then let everything become warmly
abstract: an abstract domain and problem in the form of the planet, understood
as worlds of energy-formations. Explore its sunlit and starlit terrains by
feeling into them; by experiencing them as feeling; by seeing the way they make
you feel.
The crucial distinction
here is between a seeing of intent and a seeing of how things make you feel.
With the non-animal expanses of the planet the knowledge of intent is not available,
but what remains is in every way fundamental. The sunlit and starlit terrains
of the planet hearten you, inspire you, breathe energy into you. They are
fundamentally heartening.
The
interestablishment of the human world, wrapped spherically around the planet,
is a grey perturbing expanse; a deleterious, muddy domain of control and reactivity,
a domain of the functionings of interiority.
The oneirosphere
is also wrapped spherically around the planet, and it can be seen that it is
profoundly connected to the verosphere of accounts of the world constructed as
veridical and that in crucial ways it is inseparable from it.
Feeling into these
conjoined spheres it becomes clear that there is something there which is
fundamentally outside the domain of the interestablishment. In relation to the verosphere and oneirosphere it shows up like bright light in certain zones, but in relation to
the human world as a whole it is everywhere, at different levels of intensity.
It is love-and-freedom intent, or liberatory
intent; and at its most focused it is an immensely detailed liberatory
pragmatics which can also be called metamorphics. In terms of the two spheres
what in fact is most central to it is that it is a world of seeing, but inseparably
it is a world of dreamings, in which the dreamings are threaded with the
outsights of seeing, of lucidity.
The functionings and products of reason are transecting aspects and included components, where the aspects and components are used in whatever ways they are needed, within the liberatory pragmatics.
The issue of intent is the issue of directions – and most crucially it is the issue of travelling into wider realities.
However, before
moving to this issue – of intent, and directions – it is important to stay a
little longer in the affectively envisaged sphere of the planet.
This affective envisaging is the space of an active engagement with the problem of what is going on in the human
world, and of what is going on within the planet. (to move forward all means
must be used here from analysis to dreaming up what could be taking place, in
the form of oneiric hypotheses).
It is also
important to see that this is the human world grasped not as actor operating on
an inert matter, or as intellectual subject inspecting objects from a higher
level of being, but as a world included within the planet, where this world is
continually affected by the planet, in
the sense that it is continually heartened, energised and inspired by it, to the point where the impression is that the planet is continually filling
the human world with dreams. This affective account of the human world has
nothing to with the self-importance (control) machineries of the accounts of subject/object and of the-human-as-paramount-actor, and is the beginnings of a liberation of
thought.
Another aspect of
the sphere is the perturbing domain of the interestablishment, which has the appearance
of something which in some sense is extrinsic to the world of human beings, if
only in the sense that it could be left behind, and that it would be good if it
were left behind, in that it is a world of disguised
and overt control modalities, of reactivity, of subjectified affects, and of
the functionings of interiority.
It can be seen
that the world of the affective planetary sphere is profoundly enigmatic; it is
a sphere of the unknown, which nonetheless in different ways can be explored.
However there is one aspect of this sphere which is known from the outset. The beyond-the-human expanses of the planet continuously
hearten and inspire the individuals of the human world.
Love-and-freedom
intent is accurately grasped by the faculty of feeling as joy, and as a
charged, poised serenity. It is a breath of fresh air; both audacity
and delight.
But a detailed
perception of love-and-freedom intent – liberatory intent - is achieved through
lucidity delineating along the lines of the processes of decision-making,
navigation.
This modality of
intent consists of the functioning of the principles of exteriority; a process
of starting from the planet, from bodies, from faculties, from affects, from
joy, from the transcendental-empirical as opposed to the empirical, from the
world as opposed to language, and from the faculties - in particular - of
lucidity, dreaming, perception, feeling and intent.
But it can be
added that an active, imaginative exploration into the unknown is intrinsic to
this form of intent, and that becomings are fundamental to it. Furthermore,
what is also intrinsic to it is a capacity for a focus on the singularities of
the sphere of immediacy that is the domain of navigation, a sphere which has
the affective sphere of the planet as a primary aspect of its horizon.
In relation to the conjoined verosphere and oneirosphere the existence of bodies of work consisting of a liberatory pragmatics entails that writing is in the foreground from this perspective. However, properly speaking a liberatory pragmatics is a world of outsights and actions, rather than an array of books, and from the second perspective - of directions - writing and language as a whole have gone into the background.
In this respect what is central within love-and-freedom intent is seeing and dreamings. Seeing (lucidity) consists of outsights, and dreamings, as well as being threaded with outsights, are spread across a virtual-real range from exploratory envisagings to generative dreams about the future. At the point of involvement of language the modality can be the concepts of abstraction (concepts here includes the concepts that have been called figures) or the delineations of narrative.
Narrative can be tales (spoken or written) and can be drama, and drama now has a multitude of forms beyond the stage, forms in which the visual often is the expressive mode of the tale to a far greater extent than language. Dreamings are fundamentally pre-language, and they are now very widely instantiated in what are primarily non-language forms. The tale is the abstract core, expressible in multiple ways, and the tale is a dreaming.
And drama has a core in the form of viewpoint-personae and persona deterritorialisation which entails that it is an aspect of philosophical works in the form of dialogues, and is a modality of waking the faculties. The core of drama on these levels is becomings guided by lucidity.
It can be seen that from this perspective of liberatory intent art fades into the background as well as language, although in fact what has taken place is a transformation toward the active and toward immediacy: drama becomes a zone of modalities-for-escape within the world of becomings, at the same time as dance becomes a zone of modalities-for-escape within the world of processes of waking the body.
The tonality of liberatory intent is joy, but it also has a tonality of fierce impersonal combat, where the struggle is for freedom, and where what has to be overcome is the 'self' - in each case an individual-specific domain of functionings of interiority.
Ordinary reality has tonalities that range across a span from the gravity of morality/religion and socio-political righteousness to the affects of subjectification. It also has outlier zones consisting of paratext becomings which are in the gravitational field of religions, and of accounts of the world which are in the gravitational field of the functionings of the socio-political field. These accounts in some cases see the social world as the unfolding of the spirit, and in some cases see it as an unfolding socio-technological deterioriation (or crisis) which must be met with specific authentic virtues (there is recurrently a kind of 'piety' involved which is on the edge of, or is bound up with religion), and with some kind of allegiance to something that is discerned as the best socio-political modality for responding to the deterioration/crisis (the modality could be a specific party, or democracy, or state communism, or a revolutionary struggle against the state and capitalism). And although all along there is a best of these options in the form of democracy, this obscures the fact that the real struggle is over the horizon, and simultaneously is definitively close, relating to the transcendental-empirical, not the empirical. Everything here becomes about the Futural departures of liberatory intent, where the combat is a struggle to overcome interiority. The ongoing disaster is a transcendental-empirical process: it preceded global capitalism (global capitalism is its latest expression). And the way forward is the joy of travelling along the escape-path.
Gravity, with all its tonalities (sententiousness, outrage, rage, affected humility, melancholy exhortation, exaltation of exemplars, mockery, piety, self-rightousness, self-pity, self-importance) is a modality within ordinary reality that is visible and yet has an aspect of being obscured (this is because the faculty which sees it is lucidity). Kudos is another aspect of ordinary reality, and one which in many ways is far more visible, although individuals very recurrently disavow it in relation to their own motivation. However, the power of ordinary reality is barely touched upon by these two instances: individuals who are influential and who are understood as providing answers to fundamental problems very recurrently speak in a way where the statements are not inflected by gravity or self-aggrandisement, and their poise and precision function (and this is the main issue) to draw attention into an area which does not include the transcendental-empirical: furthermore the nature of poise in ordinary reality is that the individual has not overcome control (with its foreground or background tendency for outbursts of ugly affects), but, on the contrary, has simply been very successful in controlling their circumstances.
Sexuality comes into focus here as the most powerful energy in the human sphere - not part, in fact, of the system of subjectified affects, but a force which on occasion can temporarily disable a part of this system. It also comes into focus as very recurrently disruptive and deleterious - deintensificatory - to the extent that a primary aspect has a quality of being in some depth-level sense an 'imposition,' but where, if it is 'met' in the right way, it has a further aspect of being an intensificatory force, an energising thread within liberatory intent.
However, sexuality generally functions as a component alongside the system of subjectified moods - in the form of indulgent, deintensificatory behaviours. Along with self-importance the system of subjectified moods has fear as a primary aspect: it can be seen that control and reactivity relate to this system, in different ways. Reactivity is disfunctional fear in a very wide sense, and includes processes of unthinkingly attacking the object of fear. And control is a term for the whole domain of actions / territory-creation that is an expression of the system, and for the system itself, which also includes its anguishes and outbursts. In turn, the overall system of the functioning of interiority includes not only the system of subjectified moods, but also the systems of reason-and-revelation, and of ventures-and-lives.
Opposite all of this, the escape-path - the direction of love-and-freedom intent.
*
How could it be that the idea of disappearance is at a sufficient level
of reality for understanding the intent of a human life, and the overall plight
of human beings?
The transition involved in
disappearance has now become a transition at the level of intent - the
transition is a disappearance from ordinary reality. But in consisting of
intent it consists of the functioning of a principle of Exteriority which
concentrates on the planet beyond the human world, the perception of the
(planetary) world immediately around you, and the worlds or modalities of the
other faculties, where one of these worlds is a re-dreaming or re-envisaging of
what is taking place on the planet - and of what has been taking place during
the preceding millenia.
(In relation to the species of the planet disappearance is also a term
for extinction, and in relation to human childhood development it can function
as a name for the loss involved in instilling the mind-form of a subjectified
human being, with its deadened arrangement of faculties, its reactive feelings,
its dysfunctional self-reflection, and its embroilment in the destructive
gravity of judgemental behaviours).
At the level of joy and
adventure and love-for-the-world everything is about waking up and moving
forward, a process which can only be valuable to all involved. And at the level
of the plight of the planet and of human beings, everything is about the realisation
that it is not enough to advocate for the most socialist and environmentalist
forms of government and to adopt and propagate green ways of living, and that
it is necessary to set out - taking these forms of action with you - along the
escape-path toward wider realities. It is important to remember that in the
same way as most of self-reflection is not thought but is the blocking of
thought, the gravity of the political is part of the problem, not part of the
solution. We need to escape in the direction of the planet, moving away from
the processes which are destroying it. However the affective modality of
the departure - and what drives the movement forward - is not duty, or the
anguish of a need to escape (although there is a very clear critique of the
ongoing disaster - of ordinary reality). Instead, the departure consists of a
love for the world, and, centrally, of a love for the planet, and in a way
where ultimately the actions involved are not a question of duty.
There is a whole interestablishment of
modalities which together make up ordinary reality: an alliance of many zones,
but primarily of religion; structural aspects of politics; business; law; and
processes of production of technology and knowledge. There are kind acts taking
place everywhere, but these are not constitutive of the interestablishment:
instead they accidentally function to justify it. Processes/acts consisting of
courage, love and radical creation or innovation are in the liminal space that
is the start of the escape-path, and what is produced is continually being
drawn back into the domain of control modalities (it is a fine thing to achieve
something here, but what is of fundamental importance is to depart along the
escape-path).
To depart is to return your ticket to the projected
Improved World of the interestablishment. Not because the world cannot improve,
but because it will only improve if people depart - the projection is a
delusion.
*
Barbara O’ Brien’s formula for
going off the radar – for dropping out of sight – is now under pressure. There
is an increasing expectation that people should be contactable and should stay
in contact, and that, if they are neither communicating or messagable, their
location should be known. Ultimately these issues are superficial practical
problems – there is always a solution if you have enough dedication to the task
of getting away – but it is important to see both that someone in Barbara
O’Brien’s situation would now find it harder to go through an equivalent
transition or ‘metamorphosis,’ and that the weight of the expectations involved
falls more onto women than onto men.
However, Barbara O'Brien's need to go out of sight
was the result of a massive jolt having already taken place - one that had
taken her in the wrong direction, but which gave her a chance of changing
course and moving Forward. Her departure-trajectory will therefore generally
not be a model to follow. It is worth seeing that the result of the initial
jolt is that her situation is so extreme that the role of non-urban spaces in
her successful alteration of course is caught up in an overdetermination, because
of the complexity of the experience, though the turning-point phase is
definitely when she is at the furthest remove from the urban, and during the
phase when she is consolidating her ‘post-Operators’ state she spends most of
her time in the local park. The key issue is that O’Brien’s trajectory is a
return from extreme turbulence, which has taken her around an upward spiral of
‘normality’ to a point where it is then also possible to set out on a
deliberate, poised departure from ordinary reality, and is the fact that what
she has learned about going out of sight is
a breakthrough of knowledge that has a fundamentally wider application.
It is necessary to be as imaginative and ambitious as
possible in looking for opportunities to get away. There are always potentials
which are un-noticed or largely un-noticed: with a job there are often more
opportunities for extended leave than might initially be thought, and sometimes
there is an opportunity to leave the job, and depart for an indefinite amount
of time.
It can also be valuable to do something as simple as a
walk from an urban terrain into the terrains beyond it, as with the walk that
provided the basis for On Vanishing Land.
And sometimes it is possible to go off the radar - into an
exteriority-terrain of some kind - for only a relatively short amount of time
(the amount of time associated with the term 'holiday') and to discover that
your intent is a kind of current that leads to experiences that give you
glimpses of the escape-route, and which loosen the grip of ordinary reality on
your life.
Everything becomes a question of becoming sustained
perception - suspending thought and processes of identification/categorisation
- and also it becomes a question of seeing what dreams and stories arrive
through the encounter with the terrain. Navigation becomes about going toward
the most intense, striking, or enigmatic features, whether 'natural' or
human-made. And when thought begins it should be about the singular modalities
of what is encountered, and, when it is at its widest planetary extension, it
should place the systems of the human world as an element within the planet.
But it should be there only for a moment, and then there should be a return to
the suspension of ordinary-reality modes (in the form of perception that goes
toward something more like trance) and to navigation toward intensity that together
will eventually lead toward jolts, toward valuable perturbations.
The partly perceived escape-path has a horizon in the form
of the unknown that is knowable, and this horizon is inseparable from the
planet as the unknown. And if there is something very anomalous and in some way
sublime haunting this direction, and the domains alongside it, can anything be
perceived in relation to the darker dimension of the unknown that can be
indicated by the names 'Erl-King,' 'the Shing' etc? (and if the Operators are
understood in part as a message from the unconscious, then what aspect of the
world is being indicated?). At this point all that can be said is that the
presence within the human world of the control-tending mind-form of ordinary
reality produces an impression of this world being like a tree afflicted by a
blight that turns the tree's cellular production against itself.
A question of seeing how the space communicates - where it
takes you, as the closely perceived singular becomes the abstract. The
derelict factory and the overgrown second world war ruins have a feeling of the
sublime. Lit up in sunshine there is an oak-apple on the crumbling concrete.
*
I have twice walked out of London - an enjoyable,
day-long task. The first time was in the summer of 2000. At around 11pm I was
walking through a village in the Chilterns, on my way to find somewhere to
pitch my tent, in an area of fields and woodlands beyond the village.
In all of the houses I could see a TV screen. This
gave me a chilling impression of being in the world of a 1970s B film,
something like The Stepford Wives. In
the year 2000 there were no smartphones: if someone were to do this walk now,
they would be almost certain to have a screen in their pocket.
What is in question is whether or not we should regard our
seemingly safe, cheerful screen-worlds (the worlds of the screen, and the
spaces in which we generally look at the screens) as in some ways the most
dangerous forces we encounter. Technology is entirely a question of what can be
incorporated into a process of travelling along the escape-path, and human
inventions tend always, of course, to have very different aspects and
applications. The 'throwaway' lightness of emails and texts can, under certain
circumstances, be ideal for learning to write, and synthesisers are a powerful
deterritorialisation of sound. And as well as there being the extremely
valuable 'nomadic' uses for computers and smartphones (so that the escape-path
in effect involves the internet) if you imagine a base on the edge of a
wilderness - used by a milieu of friends for creative work - it feels
emphatically that it should have good quality devices of many kinds. However -
what insists is that alongside, maybe half a mile further up a mountain, there
should be another similar house which has none of this technology. From books
to computers, and from bells to synthesisers, the issue is always to what
extent the technology solidifies a libidinally charged distribution of the
faculties that belongs to ordinary reality. On Vanishing Land is
very clear about this: the whistle found in the M.R.James story is a reminder
that you should think very carefully about the things you have picked up and
are carrying around in your pocket.
Along with becoming sustained
perception of the world around you, there is no aspect of the principle of
Exteriority that is more important than going to the outside of urban terrains
to the maximum extent, primarily in the actual, but also in the virtual. On Vanishing Land describes a departure
from urban spaces (from London, then from Felixstowe), and the described
movement in the actual also goes outward from the immediate to the planetary
non-urban of the oceans on which the container ships travel and of the planet
as a whole as it is experienced by the figure on the hill (“there is a white
void of air beneath their feet”). In this context of the world being seen as
more like ‘feeling’, the local atmosphere of an area of Suffolk coastland
becomes an unknown space in which the unknown travels. A child has been
sleeping in an unfamiliar room, in the early morning they look out of a window,
and with a frisson of pleasure they take in the dawn street, the light, the
air, the person on the way to work, the birds, the clouds. You are at a house
surrounded by semi-desert or forested mountains, four or five practitioners of
Departure are sitting around a table on a verandah, talking and laughing, the
sunlight is dappled by a vine on the trellis above them, in the garden a bird
hovers for a moment, then flies out of sight.
*
There are three areas of exploration - three
'starting-point' zones - which need to be explored in conjunction with each
other, and to which courage needs to be brought, not because these areas are
frightening in themselves, but because without courage it is far less likely
that there will be the high-intensity experiences that are particularly
valuable for waking the faculties.
Ultimately, the faculty which
it is most important to wake is navigation, or decision-making, and the terrain
which has primacy for navigation is the planet on which we live and travel:
exploration in the sense involved here relates to a great extent to
decision-making (even though the greatest attention at the outset must be given
to perception, and to dreaming) and this is why the focus in this account is on
different modalities of travelling.
the outlands
This is a question, firstly, of visiting and travelling
within semi-wildernesses, wildernesses, scurflands and areas of countryside,
and, secondly, of breaking the grim flow of ordinary reality through becoming
sustained perception, and through an overall process of waking the faculties.
These two are parts of one process, because the terrains are likely to be
recurrently more prepossessing than urban and household terrains, providing
support for the task of becoming unbroken perception. But it is also because
they simultaneously provide support for reaching a main aspect of the faculties
of lucidity and dreaming - an embodied awareness that the human world as a
whole is a problematic, out-of-control element that is preeminently within the
planet, where the planet is understood as emphatically not on
a lower level than the awareness of human beings. This is why On Vanishing Land invokes, in
contradistinction to ordinary reality, another view in relation to humans and
the planet: “There is a white void of air beneath their feet. This white void
is the planet, it is beneath the figure on the hill, and all around them, they
are a dream within a dream…"
In turn, it can be seen that in this context the idea of
breaking the flow of ordinary reality not only involves breaking the ceaseless
flow of internal verbalising, self-reflection, and categorising/temporalising
(temporalising involves not-perceiving in the form of superimposing a process
of laying elements out along a line of time), but also straightforwardly
involves breaking the flow of use of computers, social media, televisions, and
all playback and recording devices. In fact, in terms of arrays of
technological elements, it involves whatever differences and absences which are
helpful for breaking the flow of ordinary reality: for instance a mirror
evidently has a lot in common with a camera (the machinery of self-reflection
does not just involve processes which are in the head).
This can all lead to the thought: are not the outlands
really at the level of the abstract, at the level of human intent and
attitudes? (can't you just set things up the right way in a flat or house in a
city, and learn to see and feel differently?). However, this ignores the fact
that as a starting-point the beyond-the-urban terrains are likely to be far
better at sweeping people away from the customary agreement about the nature of
the world. It also ignores the fact that in travelling beyond the starting-point
there is not just a set of attitudes, but instead there is an existence where
attention is focused on the terrain that is the planet, a terrain which is more
heartening, energising and inspiring when you go into zones beyond the spaces
of the urban world. The astonishing, sublime wilderness of the sky is always
there, whether you are in the middle of a city or on the top of a forested
mountain, but the forested mountain has a greater power to sweep you away, in
the direction of the Future.
Lenses,
diagrams, catalysts (fragments of a
mirror)
Between 2006 and 2011 I went twice to Mongolia, and once to Tuva, and
one main aspect of these journeys was a
search for skilled practitioners of overtone singing. I was looking for
musicians who would be prepared to teach me, not for professional teachers. I
did not do this in the spirit of ethnomusicology, and to say that I was doing
it as an ‘artist’ is also not quite adequate, because the word goes too fast
over what is involved, and is too tied up with ideas of performance. In setting
out to learn overtone singing I was looking for a form of vocal
deterritorialisation with a high potential for expressiveness and for
conduction toward heartened, intensified states.
a story
Many tens of thousands of years ago, in Africa, humans and animals together
constructed a mirror in which it was possible to see other worlds. It was not a
mirror as we now understand the term: in it were the reflections of other
dimensions of reality, and of worlds in distant galaxies. Through looking into
it, over time it became possible to see the other worlds without its
assistance, and to communicate with beings who came from physically far-distant
places. Many realised at this time that some of these other entities had helped
them in the construction of the mirror.
It was discovered that it was possible to travel to the
most recondite confines of reality, and to distant galaxies. Perhaps as a
result of an immoderate use of this ability, a group of humans made contact
with beings inhabiting a region thousands of galaxies distant from the Earth.
These beings were composed of a form of dark matter similar to plasma, and were
energy and affect predators. On one level they were immensely sophisticated,
striking from a higher level of reality than that of their prey, and on another
level they consisted of a crude, two-dimensional form of existence. Having
encountered humans, they came to the Earth, and installed themselves as
elements within its nonorganic eco-system. They implanted living models of their
mind into the minds of humans, shifting the human species toward
control-behaviours, and toward possessiveness and strife.
With the aid of the mirror many humans and animals escaped
to other worlds. But because it was associated with the disaster which had
befallen the planet, the mirror was destroyed: it was broken into countless
tiny fragments. For a long time the area where it had been created was
connected in peoples' minds with the memory of something bad, but then this
memory was also lost.
Not long after the arrival of the predators, and the
destruction of the mirror, some of the humans who were less affected by the
implanted mind came together. They did not want to take sides within the
complex of struggles and violent conflicts which the human world had become,
and some of them decided to travel into the regions of the planet beyond
Africa. An old woman, who was the leader of a group which had chosen to
stay and live within the Kalahari desert and the jungles of western Africa,
said that they should all take fragments of the mirror with them. Remembering
the bright time of the mirror, they went to the place where it had been, and
took with them as many fragments as they could carry.
The representatives of all the animals came
together on the beach of a remote bay in eastern Africa. A message had come to
them from the other worlds with which animals and humans had been in contact -
worlds in other dimensions and in other parts of the cosmos. They had been told
that for the most part contact would now no longer be possible, and that,
although animals were less affected by the predators, they would now drop back
to a lower level of awareness and forget the time of the mirror. They had come
together to decide how to mitigate the disaster. One of their leaders, a female
wolf from the Atlas mountains,said
"Out of affection, some of you horses will travel with the humans,
and so will some of my kind, the prairie dogs and wolves."
"But us dogs and wolves are pack creatures, with a code of obeying
a leader, and eventually we will be enslaved. And you horses are not quite wild
enough to avoid enslavement."
"This is not enough."
After a long silence, the representative of a small species of cat came
forward.
"We will go" said the cat. "Over time we will lose some
of our independence, but we will not become enslaved, and we will be a link
between humans and the planet."
Small bands of humans, horses, dogs and cats set out into
the west and south and north of Africa, and from the north of Africa some of
the groups continued. The fragments of the mirror were taken with them, and,
although those who set out in the end consisted as much of people strongly
affected by the implanted mind as those less affected, including people who
attacked the cats because they refused to be domesticated into slavery, the
fragments of the mirror helped them in their journeys into Eurasia, and
eventually into the Americas.
Very early in the diaspora a
large group, which had many mirror fragments, used small boats to cross from
Indonesia to Australia. And in Australia for many tens of thousands of years
the idea of the dreamtime was a faint memory of the time of the mirror.
It seems there is an other distribution of
the faculties, and it also seems that beyond around four thousand years into
the past this other distribution was effectuated substantially more often than
now (this would not in any way entail that things as a whole were better beyond
this point, because it is the overall pattern of states of being, within a
social field, that would be key for such an assessment, and because it is how
this distribution is put into effect which is crucial). However, the chronological
aspect should not be overemphasised: it is the nature of what you find that
matters, and not whether it is ancient, or was originated in ancient times.
What is crucial is an overall openness, followed in turn by an openness to the
modalities found within nomadic and tribal societies, and then also by an
openness in relation to the ancient past (and in fact openness in the last two
cases must be a reversal of the customary 'primitivising' ways of thinking
about the worlds involved).
Everything here on one level concerns systems of action in
relation to the human body, where the main coordinates for thinking about what
is in question are deterritorialisation of the body, dance, health-intensifying
techniques, and systems of becoming-active and of waking the faculties; and on
another level it involves systems of philosophical thought. This can be
illustrated by taking up a second mode of travelling: going to a country and
finding someone who can teach some rare, singular modality, such as a more
focused way of understanding the world; or a form of dance, or overtone singing,
or a system/discipline of movement etc.
This in part concerns intensificatory, or
health-assisting techniques, but it also involves transcendental-empirical
knowledge, and includes skills such as learning how to behave in relation to
animals and how to exist/survive in specific wild terrains; and, again, it includes a range of
physical/artistic skills that extend through dance to acting.
Track 08, copyright Justin Barton and Pete Wiseman:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/xeedy542oklygwyxr29il/08-Track-8.wma?rlkey=pata21q95dlvkwjcdwj9dfpoz&st=op566hw0&dl=0
Becomings
The idea of 'acting' leads to a third modality of
travelling, one which opens up the idea of becomings along an additional axis.
A valuable possibility is to travel as another version of yourself. Find your
fascinations and interests which contingently have been in the background, and
bring them into the foreground as coordinates for decision-making and for
giving an account of yourself - a construction of a persona involving a
substantially changed emphasis, as opposed to 'lying,' and one which, if it is
constructed wisely, will lead to a wider way of being which is more true to who
you are than the starting-point. Think, 'what objects would this person be
carrying with them, and what would they be wearing?' and make adjustments:
'objects' have more power to help in focusing a new persona than we generally
realise.
The initial, and primary, aspect of becomings is
entering into composition with other beings and other kinds of being. Because
of a very subtle, depth-level suppression which has taken place within the
human world, becoming-woman, as Deleuze and Guattari have pointed out, is the
key becoming - the one that leads to all the other becomings (it should be
added that being in love with a woman is a fundamental form of becoming-woman,
but this state needs to be maintained as a desubjectified aspect of Departure,
rather than it being collapsed into a thread of ordinary reality). The horizon
becoming, however (the one which in a specific sense is involved simultaneously
with the others) is entering into becoming with the planet, but where the sky -
the atmosphere - of the planet is very much in the foreground. The virtual-real
or 'envisaging' processes of becoming-sky or becoming-atmosphere are
fundamental in the escape from ordinary reality, and are the central aspect of
entering into composition with the planet (and because what is involved here is
transcendental materialism it is valuable and directly relevant to remember
that on one level entering into composition with the atmosphere is another name
for breathing).
It will be noticed that the
planet here reaches a crucial point of double-inscription. It starts out as the
primary terrain of decision-making – of navigation – for the starting-points of
exploration, and at the end appears as the ‘other side’ of the most
encompassing of the human becomings.
Note: Within the fundamental historical shift a
primary movement is toward projecting from a male-dominated social field (women
are betrayed at this point) in a delerium-about-control which blocks off the
planet, and which inseparably locks attention onto human interiority (animals
and the whole planet are betrayed at this second 'stage'). What follows, and
then runs alongside, are human cognitive and organisational systems which are
fixated on human societies and technologies, and which have a subtle righteousness
and concealed lack of openness.
Tribal and nomadic societies have their own systems of
control and suppression, but they have a recurrent tendency to see animals as
sublime, tutelary worlds of intent and awareness. The loss of this view of animals
is a key indicator of a specific phase of the historical shift. The ongoing
disaster deepened around four thousand years ago, and with the current
destruction of habitats and species, together with people being taken still
further away from transcendental-empirical knowledge, it is currently crossing
a further downward threshold.
Note 2
Speaking generally,
technology is not less than we think it is, but more, although in a rather
grim, disturbing sense of 'more' (an element of transcendental materialism
is what can be called 'gothic' materialism). Like human beings, technology is
of course an element of the planet - a part of nature - but the crucial point
is that preponderantly it is a component of ordinary reality, and of the
ongoing disaster within the human world. However, it is just a question of
working out what it is valuable to take with you - and what can be valuably
developed - in the process of travelling along the escape-path. And if you have
been swept into a process of deterritorialisation in relation to it (one which
might only be tangential to your overall process of departure) the internet,
like the worlds of the cities, has a faint but striking quality of the sublime,
which comes from it being a ruinous terrain - like the cities, it was born
ruinous.
*
In conclusion, it is possible to describe four features of touching the ground lightly, which is a primary, pervasive aspect of travelling along the escape-path.
touching the ground lightly
Firstly, this is an
embodied tendency to be as careful as possible in relation to the planet. An
affirmation of the planet which both consists of a minimal use of resources,
and an exploration of new ways of cutting back the damage done by the footprint
of a human existence.
Secondly this is a heightening of the body,
and a waking of the faculties. The attribute of touching the ground
lightly is here the ‘obvious’ one, where this, in the context, is an indicator
of a wider fluency.
Thirdly, this is an avoidance of
counter-productive disputes, whether with those whose position is centred on
religion, or with those whose view is based on an empirico-rational stance. For
instance, within the second domain of views there is a great amount that is
shared, and here it is a question of working with what is in common. The
absolute affirmations here are of environmentalism and of socialist values of
kindness, knowledge and freedom, together with key elements of critique -
Marx's critique of religion, and the overall critique of the depredations of
capitalist/corporate power. But the affirmation beyond this - and the one where
it is a question of avoiding counter-productive disputes - is of a radical
socialism consisting not of overthrow or evolution of the state (which is
trapped within capitalism) but of micro-departures from ordinary reality.
Fourthly, and most importantly, this
is a perceptual attention that is centred on the sky, and when indoors, on the
air and light in front of you; so that when you are outside your attention is
centred on a point just above the horizon, and what is primarily seen is the
space of sky, and, by extension, the whole space of air in front of you. Seeing
the sky and the clouds is primary, and if the space of air starts to be seen
and felt/experienced as a space of light (so that in a room you might have the
experience of being a room-shaped zone of gold-coloured light, and of a tactile
contact with the walls) then this is a good development, so long as you don't
get caught up in thinking about it. What is crucial is that what you were
seeing as the figure - the solid objects - instead becomes the ground, the ground
that it was all along. The figure is the sky: it is air and light. The ground
is the solid objects. And our attention needs to touch the ground
lightly.
The faculty we need to wake first is perception.
And the second faculty we need to wake is dreaming.
* * *